Is serviceberry high in fructose?

Watch for

• Wild variability is the honest caveat on this page.Amelanchier species differ from each other in sweetness, seed hardness and astringency, and individual trees differ again, so a dry, tannic serviceberry off an ornamental in a car park and a plump one off a good wild thicket are not the same eating experience. No grade can resolve that for you, and it is the main reason the confidence rating here is low
• A naming collision that genuinely trips people up: in Britain the service tree is Sorbus domestica and the wild service tree is Sorbus torminalis, both close relatives of rowan, and both produce fruit so astringent it is inedible until it has bletted, meaning over-ripened or frosted into softness.Those are not Amelanchier and none of the grades on this page apply to them
• This is a pome, related to apple, pear and hawthorn rather than to blueberry.Anyone whose mouth itches after raw apple from birch pollen food allergy syndrome has a reason for a cautious first taste. No serviceberry-specific cross-reactivity has been documented, so treat it as a botanical heads-up rather than a warning
• FODMAP grades are unrated, not low.Nobody has run this fruit through a portion analysis, and the picking habit it invites, a cupful eaten standing under the tree, is exactly the sort of dose that would expose a sugar issue if there is one
• Serviceberry is one of the most planted small ornamental trees in North American towns, so a great deal of the fruit gets picked from street plantings and car park borders.Where the tree stands is a fair question about municipal spraying and road grime, and it is not something a trigger grade covers